A theoretical framework for managing training materials toward open education in colleges in mountainous areas
Keywords:
theoretical framework, training materials, training materials management, open education, mountainous collegesAbstract
This study develops a theoretical framework for managing training materials toward open education in colleges in mountainous areas. Using document analysis, synthesis, systematization, and theoretical generalization, the study integrates three complementary perspectives: the Systems Approach, the Planning, Organizing, Leading, and Controlling management cycle, and the Technology Acceptance Model. The proposed framework consists of four interrelated components: context and inputs, management process, technology acceptance, and outputs and feedback. The framework explains the relationships among institutional conditions, management activities, technological systems, and users in the development, use, adaptation, and sharing of training materials. Particular attention is given to the specific conditions of mountainous colleges, including socioeconomic constraints, geographical characteristics, technological infrastructure, cultural and ethnic diversity, and the digital competence of lecturers and learners. The framework provides a theoretical basis for analyzing management practices and developing appropriate measures to improve the accessibility, effective use, sharing, and sustainable development of training materials toward open education in colleges in mountainous areas.
Downloads
References
Adedoyin, O. B., & Altinay, F. (2023). Open educational resources: Evaluation of students’ intention to use and motivation to create. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(6), 1790–1813. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13313
Fischer, L., Hilton, J., III, Robinson, T. J., & Wiley, D. A. (2015). A multi-institutional study of the impact of open textbook adoption on the learning outcomes of post-secondary students. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 27(3), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-015-9101-x
Hilton, J., III. (2016). Open educational resources and college textbook choices: A review of research on efficacy and perceptions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 573–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9434-9
Jung, I., & Lee, J. (2020). A cross-cultural approach to the adoption of open educational resources in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(1), 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12820
Lane, A., & McAndrew, P. (2010). Are open educational resources systematic or systemic change agents for teaching practice? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(6), 952–962. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01119.x
Littlejohn, A., & Hood, N. (2017). How educators build knowledge and expand their practice: The case of open education resources. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 499–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12438
Menzli, L. J., Smirani, L. K., Boulahia, J. A., & Hadjouni, M. (2022). Investigation of open educational resources adoption in higher education using Rogers’ diffusion of innovation theory. Heliyon, 8(7), e09885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09885
Murphy, A. (2013). Open educational practices in higher education: Institutional adoption and challenges. Distance Education, 34(2), 201–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.793641
Scanlon, E. (2014). Scholarship in the digital age: Open educational resources, publication and public engagement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12010
Tang, H. (2020). Understanding K–12 teachers’ intention to adopt open educational resources: A mixed methods inquiry. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 2558–2572. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12937
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tennessee Research International of Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the Tennessee Research International of Social Sciences (TRISS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant TRISS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in TRISS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.