A theoretical framework for managing training materials toward open education in colleges in mountainous areas

Authors

  • Do Thi Thanh Thuy Hanoi Metropolitan University, Vietnam

Keywords:

theoretical framework, training materials, training materials management, open education, mountainous colleges

Abstract

This study develops a theoretical framework for managing training materials toward open education in colleges in mountainous areas. Using document analysis, synthesis, systematization, and theoretical generalization, the study integrates three complementary perspectives: the Systems Approach, the Planning, Organizing, Leading, and Controlling management cycle, and the Technology Acceptance Model. The proposed framework consists of four interrelated components: context and inputs, management process, technology acceptance, and outputs and feedback. The framework explains the relationships among institutional conditions, management activities, technological systems, and users in the development, use, adaptation, and sharing of training materials. Particular attention is given to the specific conditions of mountainous colleges, including socioeconomic constraints, geographical characteristics, technological infrastructure, cultural and ethnic diversity, and the digital competence of lecturers and learners. The framework provides a theoretical basis for analyzing management practices and developing appropriate measures to improve the accessibility, effective use, sharing, and sustainable development of training materials toward open education in colleges in mountainous areas.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Do Thi Thanh Thuy, Hanoi Metropolitan University, Vietnam

This study develops a theoretical framework for managing training materials toward open education in colleges in mountainous areas. Using document analysis, synthesis, systematization, and theoretical generalization, the study integrates three complementary perspectives: the Systems Approach, the Planning, Organizing, Leading, and Controlling management cycle, and the Technology Acceptance Model. The proposed framework consists of four interrelated components: context and inputs, management process, technology acceptance, and outputs and feedback. The framework explains the relationships among institutional conditions, management activities, technological systems, and users in the development, use, adaptation, and sharing of training materials. Particular attention is given to the specific conditions of mountainous colleges, including socioeconomic constraints, geographical characteristics, technological infrastructure, cultural and ethnic diversity, and the digital competence of lecturers and learners. The framework provides a theoretical basis for analyzing management practices and developing appropriate measures to improve the accessibility, effective use, sharing, and sustainable development of training materials toward open education in colleges in mountainous areas.

References

Adedoyin, O. B., & Altinay, F. (2023). Open educational resources: Evaluation of students’ intention to use and motivation to create. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(6), 1790–1813. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13313

Fischer, L., Hilton, J., III, Robinson, T. J., & Wiley, D. A. (2015). A multi-institutional study of the impact of open textbook adoption on the learning outcomes of post-secondary students. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 27(3), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-015-9101-x

Hilton, J., III. (2016). Open educational resources and college textbook choices: A review of research on efficacy and perceptions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 573–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9434-9

Jung, I., & Lee, J. (2020). A cross-cultural approach to the adoption of open educational resources in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(1), 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12820

Lane, A., & McAndrew, P. (2010). Are open educational resources systematic or systemic change agents for teaching practice? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(6), 952–962. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01119.x

Littlejohn, A., & Hood, N. (2017). How educators build knowledge and expand their practice: The case of open education resources. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 499–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12438

Menzli, L. J., Smirani, L. K., Boulahia, J. A., & Hadjouni, M. (2022). Investigation of open educational resources adoption in higher education using Rogers’ diffusion of innovation theory. Heliyon, 8(7), e09885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09885

Murphy, A. (2013). Open educational practices in higher education: Institutional adoption and challenges. Distance Education, 34(2), 201–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.793641

Scanlon, E. (2014). Scholarship in the digital age: Open educational resources, publication and public engagement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12010

Tang, H. (2020). Understanding K–12 teachers’ intention to adopt open educational resources: A mixed methods inquiry. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 2558–2572. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12937

Downloads

Published

2026-09-26

How to Cite

Thuy, D. T. T. (2026). A theoretical framework for managing training materials toward open education in colleges in mountainous areas. Tennessee Research International of Social Sciences, 8(2), 194–201. Retrieved from http://triss.org/index.php/journal/article/view/173

Issue

Section

Research Articles