Governance of high school students’ learning assessment data in digital environments theoretical foundations and a conceptual framework
Keywords:
assessment data governance, digital assessment, formative assessment, high school, digital environment, VietnamAbstract
Digital assessment generates increasing amounts of information about students’ learning, creating a need for schools to consider not only how assessment data are collected but also how they are organized, interpreted, accessed, protected, and used. This study examines the theoretical foundations of assessment data governance and develops a conceptual framework for high school education in digital environments. A qualitative literature review was conducted using 21 publications related to formative assessment, digital assessment, assessment literacy, feedback, and assessment data use. The literature was analyzed through thematic coding and comparison. The findings identify six principles of assessment data governance: accuracy, validity, accessibility, security and privacy, transparency, and accountability. Based on these principles, a framework comprising five interconnected components is proposed: data generation and collection, data storage and organization, data analysis and interpretation, data use and feedback, and data security, accountability, and quality assurance. The study also clarifies the roles of school leaders, teachers, students, and technical support personnel in the governance process. The framework highlights that assessment data governance is not merely a technical issue but an educational and managerial process in which professional judgment remains central. The study provides a theoretical basis for further empirical research and for developing assessment data governance practices in high schools in Hanoi and Vietnam.
Downloads
References
Andersson, C., & Palm, T. (2018). Reasons for teachers’ successful development of a formative assessment practice through professional development: A motivation perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 576–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1430685
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807
Casanova, D., Alsop, G., & Huet, I. (2021). Giving away some of their powers! Towards learner agency in digital assessment and feedback. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 16(1), Article 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-021-00168-6
Cooper, A., DeLuca, C., Holden, M., & MacGregor, S. (2022). Emergency assessment: Rethinking classroom practices and priorities amid remote teaching. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 29(5), 534–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2022.2069084
Cuong, T. V., Dung, N. V. V., Tinh, T. T., & Hau, N. H. (2025). Mathematical modelling for monitoring tree growth in school green initiatives in Vietnam. International Journal of Ecosystems & Ecology Sciences, 15(2), 203.
Dalby, D., & Swan, M. (2019). Using digital technology to enhance formative assessment in mathematics classrooms. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 832–845. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12606
DeLuca, C., Chapman-Chin, A., & Klinger, D. A. (2019). Toward a teacher professional learning continuum in assessment for learning. Educational Assessment, 24(4), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2019.1670056
Hai, T. T., Thao, T. T. P., & Tinh, T. T. (2016). Assess ICT competences in teaching of teachers and trainee teachers at highland North Vietnam. Education, 54, 27–98.
Hai, T. T., & Tinh, T. T. (2016). Some teachers’ technical in assessing pupils’ learning mathematics process in Vietnam. Annals. Computer Science Series, 14(1), 30.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Jensen, L. X., Bearman, M., & Boud, D. (2021). Understanding feedback in online learning: A critical review and metaphor analysis. Computers & Education, 173, 104271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104271
Jónsson, Í. R., Smith, K., & Geirsdóttir, G. (2018). Shared language of feedback and assessment: Perception of teachers and students in three Icelandic secondary schools. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 56, 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.11.003
Nieminen, J. H., Bearman, M., & Ajjawi, R. (2023). Designing the digital in authentic assessment: Is it fit for purpose? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(4), 529–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2089627
Phuong Thao, N., & Thi Kim Nhung, L. (2025). The effects of an online formative assessment practice on students’ self-regulated learning: An experimental study at a secondary school in Hanoi. HNUE Journal of Science: Educational Sciences, 70(4), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.18173/2354-1075.2025-0072
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714
Schildkamp, K., van der Kleij, F. M., Heitink, M. C., Kippers, W. B., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2020). Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 103, 101602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101602
Stiggins, R. J. (1991). Assessment literacy. Phi Delta Kappan, 72(7), 534–539.
Tinh, T. T. (2015). Teachers assess student's mathematical creativity competence in high school. Journal of Science & Arts, 15(4), 335.
Van Luong, N., Khanh, M. Q., Cuong, T. V., & Tinh, T. T. (2024). Evaluating the pedagogical professionalism of students in pedagogical universities in Vietnam in the context of open knowledge. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 4.
Vattøy, K.-D., Gamlem, S. M., Kobberstad, L. R., & Rogne, W. M. (2022). Students’ experiences of assessment and feedback engagement in digital contexts: A mixed-methods case study in upper secondary school. Education Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2022.2122202
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tennessee Research International of Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the Tennessee Research International of Social Sciences (TRISS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant TRISS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in TRISS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.