School family and community collaboration in managing experiential activities in private primary schools
Keywords:
experiential activities, private primary schools, collaborative governance, relational trust, student participation, educational equityAbstract
Managing experiential activities requires schools to coordinate educational responsibilities with the knowledge and resources of families and community organizations. This article examines how collaboration can sustain pupils’ participation when partners have unequal resources and different expectations. A conceptual synthesis of collaborative governance, network organization, relational trust and children’s participation is used to develop four mechanisms: communicating educational purposes through concrete learning tasks, defining decision rights, providing accessible channels for concerns, and separating core learning opportunities from optional contributions. The analysis shows why participation counts and satisfaction reports alone provide an incomplete basis for evaluating partnerships. Attention must also be given to who influences decisions, how disagreements are resolved and which pupils undertake substantive work. Four propositions connect these mechanisms to partnership practice and provide a basis for empirical investigation. The discussion considers the implications for private primary schools, where professional responsibilities may intersect with parental expectations and dependence on external resources. The framework contributes an account of collaboration that links educational purpose with authority, trust and access. Its applicability across different school contexts remains a question for empirical research.
Downloads
References
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
Boonk, L., Gijselaers, H. J. M., Ritzen, H., & Brand-Gruwel, S. (2018). A review of the relationship between parental involvement indicators and academic achievement. Educational Research Review, 24, 10–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.02.001
Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. Russell Sage Foundation.
Castro, M., Expósito-Casas, E., López-Martín, E., Lizasoain, L., Navarro-Asencio, E., & Gaviria, J. L. (2015). Parental involvement on student academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 14, 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.01.002
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Macmillan.
Goodall, J., & Montgomery, C. (2014). Parental involvement to parental engagement: A continuum. Educational Review, 66(4), 399–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2013.781576
Kim, S. (2022). Fifty years of parental involvement and achievement research: A second-order meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 37, Article 100463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100463
Lundy, L. (2007). ‘Voice’ is not enough: Conceptualising Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. British Educational Research Journal, 33(6), 927–942. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701657033
Mager, U., & Nowak, P. (2012). Effects of student participation in decision making at school. A systematic review and synthesis of empirical research. Educational Research Review, 7(1), 38–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2011.11.001
Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum015
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tennessee Research International of Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the Tennessee Research International of Social Sciences (TRISS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant TRISS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in TRISS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.