A comparative study on educational philosophies of Hồ Chí Minh and John Dewey: values, differences, and potentials for integration in Vietnam’s educational reform
Keywords:
Hồ Chí Minh, John Dewey, educational reform, educational values, philosophical differencesAbstract
In the context of Vietnam’s ongoing educational reform, comparing major educational philosophies provides a crucial foundation for strategic orientation. Hồ Chí Minh, with his humanistic philosophy emphasizing holistic human development, and John Dewey, a representative of Western experimental education, have laid down two distinct yet influential value systems from the East and the West. This paper analyzes and compares their core values, identifies fundamental differences, and evaluates the potential integration of their strengths into Vietnam’s educational transformation. The study highlights not only their shared commitment to learner-centered and holistic education but also the complementary nature and tensions between the two traditions when applied in practice. Accordingly, the paper proposes solutions to build a modern, democratic, and creative Vietnamese education system rooted in national identity and international integration.
Downloads
References
John Dewey. Democracy and Education. Macmillan, 1916.
John Dewey. Experience and Education. Macmillan, 1938.
Hồ Chí Minh. Toàn tập (Vol. 5). Hanoi: National Political Publishing House, 2011.
Hồ Chí Minh. Toàn tập (Vol. 9). Hanoi: National Political Publishing House, 2011.
Hồ Chí Minh. Toàn tập (Vol. 10). Hanoi: National Political Publishing House, 2011.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Tennessee Research International of Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the Tennessee Research International of Social Sciences (TRISS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant TRISS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in TRISS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.